Legal Opinion · Dissent
City of Huntsville v. Tack
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided August 30, 2002No. 1010459Published
1DissentWoodall, Justice
“An intervenor must have a direct, substantial, and legally protectable interest in the proceeding.” State Highway Dep’t v. Parsons, 623 So.2d 285, 290 (Ala.1993). I am convinced that Sheila Tack, Loyce Fisher, and Katherine Nagel had no such interest in this proceeding. Therefore, I must conclude that the trial court erred in granting their Ala. R. Civ. P. 24(b)(2) motion for permissive intervention. I respectfully dissent.
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State Highway Department v. ParsonsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993