Legal Opinion

Pedrick v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 22, 1906PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action is brought by the plaintiffs, citizens of the town of Washington, for the purpose of enjoining defendant corporation from constructing and maintaining a bridge across the Pamlico River, (487) a navigable waterway, wholly within this State, at the said town, for that "said bridge will materially burden, impede and obstruct navigation over said river and will constitute a public nuisance by rendering it difficult to pass said bridge with sailing vessels and floating rafts, barges, and other crafts, which are constantly plying the waters of said stream in their commerce with the said…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Minot v. Philadelphia, Wilmington & Baltimore RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. People v. Rensselaer & Saratoga Rail RoadNew York Supreme Court · 1836
  3. Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  4. Wylie v. ElwoodIllinois Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Doggett v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hampton v. North Carolina Pulp Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  2. Rogers v. City of MobileSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
  3. Brown v. Florida Chautauqua Ass'nSupreme Court of Florida · 1910
  4. Case-Fowler Lumber Co. v. WinslettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1929
  5. Gaither v. Albemarle Hospital, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API