Legal Opinion

State v. Sundberg

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 22, 2015No. 05102194; A150611PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDuncan, P. J.

In this criminal case, the state appeals the trial court’s pretrial order excluding certain testimony. See ORS 138.060(l)(c) (providing for appeals by the state of trial court pre-trial orders suppressing evidence). The court excluded the testimony on the grounds that it was irrelevant and an impermissible comment on the credibility of a witness. For the reasons explained below, we conclude that the evidence was relevant and was not an impermissible comment on the credibility of a witness. Therefore, we reverse and remand.

The state tried defendant for sexual abuse in the first degree, ORS…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. MiddletonOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  3. State v. MilbradtOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  4. State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  5. State v. LupoliOregon Supreme Court · 2010

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. CriswellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2016
  2. State v. SwinneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2015
  3. State v. BrandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API