Legal Opinion · Dissent

Eakin v. Wycoff

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 7, 1925No. 25,718Published

1DissentHarvey, J.

While I do not agree with the opinion of the court as written in some other respects, I shall discuss but two points: (1) Whether there is any substantial evidence of the joint consent of the husband and wife to the alienation of the homestead, and (2) whether facts were shown that take the case out from under the statute of frauds.'

Let us examine the evidence of the trade and Mrs. Wycoff’s consent thereto. The plaintiff testified:

“Mr. Wycoff and I met one evening at the Oriental hotel, and having conversation, as we did quite often, and he*-to start with, Mr. Reynolds, rather, wanted to…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Clegg v. BrannanTexas Supreme Court · 1921
  2. Morris v. WardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1869
  3. Edwards v. FrySupreme Court of Kansas · 1872
  4. Durand v. HigginsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1903
  5. Baldwin v. BaldwinSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API