Legal Opinion
Weitzman v. Stein
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided December 19, 1995No. 70 Civ. 4037 (DNE)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION & ORDER
EDELSTEIN, District Judge:
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b) (“Rule 60(b)”), plaintiff moves this Court to reconsider , the amount of attorneys’ fees that this Court awarded to plaintiff in this Court’s June 29, 1995, Opinion and Order. In that Opinion and Order, this Court awarded plaintiff the reasonable costs that she incurred in prosecuting the contempt of defense counsel, Barry Schwartz, for his violation of this Court’s May 16, 1988, Order. Plaintiff contends that this Court improperly calculated plaintiffs attorneys’ fees at an hourly rate of $150 per…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Messenger v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Vuitton Et Fils S. A. v. Carousel Handbags, and Solomon Mizrahi, Joseph Mizrahi, and Maurice Mizrahi, Additional DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1979
- United States v. Carol BirneyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Transaero, Inc. v. La Fuerza Area Boliviana, an Instrumentality of the Republic of Bolivia, a Foreign StateCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Carole Heller Weitzman, as Assignee of Saul Weitzman v. Sidney Stein, Norman Rubinson and Albert Feiffer, Barry Schwartz, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- Walsh v. McGeeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1996
- Bonnie & Co. Fashions, Inc. v. Bankers Trust Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1997
- Salud Services, Inc. v. Caterpillar, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2014
- Ampion Corp. v. AXXA Tech, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.