Legal Opinion

Hann v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided August 16, 2017No. 15-20Published

1Opinion of the Court

1Jn tbe mtntteb $tates <teourt of jfeberal <telaims No. 15-20T (Filed: August 16, 2017) FILED AUG 1 6 2017 *********** ** ** *** * *** *** * * U.S. COURT OF GREGORY ALAN HANN AND FEDERAL CLAIMS * BARBARA CHILDS HANN, * Tax Refund Suit; 26 U.S.C. § 83; 26 C.F.R. * § 1.83-7; Nonqualified Stock Options; Plaintiffs, * Cashless Option Exercise; Initial Public * Offering (IPO); Underwriters' v. * Commission; Capital Loss. * THE UNITED STATES, * * Defendant. * * ************************* * Gregory Hann and Barbara Childs Hann, Virginia Beach, Virginia, prose. David A. Hubbert, David I. Pinlrus, Mary…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Mingus Constructors, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
  4. Commissioner v. LoBueSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  5. Woodward v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1970

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API