Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

U S Air Force Court of Military Review

Decided September 21, 1989No. ACM 27674PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION

LEONARD, Judge:

Appellant asserts two errors for our consideration. We find limited merit in one and no merit in the other.

In the asserted error of limited merit, appellant maintains that the military judge should have granted him 65 days of additional credit for pretrial confinement under R.C.M. 305(k). At his trial, appellant asserted such credit was due because of two noncompliances with the requirements of R.C.M. 305.

First, appellant asserts that the military magistrate who conducted his pretrial confinement hearing did not properly apply the standards set out in R.C.M.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. LavallaU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  2. United States v. RiosU S Air Force Court of Military Review · 1987
  3. United States v. SheltonU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. WhiteUnited States Air Force Court of Criminal Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API