Legal Opinion

Ruckle v. Barbour

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1874PublishedCited by 12 opinions

From the Marion Civil Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBuskiek, C. J.

The complaint in this cause avers substantially the following facts:

That on the 3d day of January, 1871, the Indiana National Bank of Indianapolis, assignee of Joseph A. Yancy, recovered a judgment against John Fetro for six hundred and one dollars and sixty-five cents; ^iat in the same action the court further adjudged that the sum of eleven hundred and twenty-six dollars would be due from said Fetro to said bank on March 1st, 1871; that the further sum of eighteen hundred aud fifty-seven dollars and ninety cents would be due March 1st, 1872; and the further sum of nineteen hundred and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Barney v. Patterson's LesseeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1824
  2. Lynch v. JenningsIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
  3. Curran v. CurranIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Rardin v. WalpoleIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  5. State ex rel. Wilber v. SalyersIndiana Supreme Court · 1862

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Morrison v. JacobyIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Jones v. Kokomo Building Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Ridgway v. IngramIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  4. Coombs v. CarrIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  5. Carnahan v. YerkesIndiana Supreme Court · 1882

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API