Legal Opinion

Appelget v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided January 30, 1926No. A-4694PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdwards, J.

For convenience and brevity, the plaintiffs in error will be referred to as defendants.

The defendants were stockholders and officers of the Bank of Goltry. In connection with one H. 0. Brown they entered into negotiations with J. B. Vosburg for the purchase of the stock of the Farmers’ State Bank of Lahoma. After some negotiations, the two defendants, with Brown at Lahoma, concluded a purchase of 85 shares of the stock of that bank for an agreed consideration of $22,100. This transaction was concluded on March 5th. H. 0. Brown had a little personal property of inconsequential value, and had…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Star v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Price v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Jackson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1925
  5. Appelget v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Witte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
  2. McClure v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API