Legal Opinion

State v. Sanders

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided January 15, 2008No. A06-1354PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

Appellant challenges his conviction for first-degree criminal sexual conduct, Minn. Stat. § 609.342, subd. 1(a) (2004), arguing that the district court erred by admitting the statements he made to FBI officers in Chicago, Illinois, who did not record the statements as required for admission at trial under Minnesota law by State v. Scales, 518 N.W.2d 587 (Minn.1994). Appellant also asserts that the court erred by admitting evidence of prior sexual misconduct against the victim and her sister under Minn.Stat. § 634.20 (2004), absent the procedural safeguards required by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State v. ScalesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
  2. Dukes v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2001
  3. State v. McCoySupreme Court of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. NessSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
  5. State v. LahueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  2. In Re Disciplinary Action Against ZentnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2008
  3. State v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009
  4. State v. SandersSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API