Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. City of Quincy
Illinois Supreme Court
Appeal from the County Court of Adams county; the Hon. B. F. Serbian, Judge, presiding.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Scholfield
It is enacted by section 29 of “An act amendatory of and supplemental to an act entitled ‘An act to incorporate the city •of Quincy,’” (Private Laws of 1855, p. 68,) “that the city of Quincy and the Northern Cross Railroad Company are hereby authorized and empowered, on such terms and for such considerations as the said parties may agree upon, to make and conclude any contracts and agreements for the establishing, opening or abolishing any part of any streets, avenues or alleys within the jurisdiction of said city, adjoining or dividing any property which is or may be owned and used by the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Louisville City Railway Co. v. City of LouisvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1871
- City of Quincy v. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Chicago, Danville & Vincennes Railroad v. City of ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1887
- People Ex Rel. Markey v. . City of BrooklynNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bowers v. City of TaylorTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- City of Wink v. Wink Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1938
- Hughes v. City of MomenceIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Railroad Co. v. DefianceOhio Supreme Court · 1895