Legal Opinion

Hickey v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1915PublishedCited by 23 opinions

PROM PUTNAM. Appeal from the Criminal Court of Putnam County. —J. H. Gardenhire, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Fancher

The defendant was prosecuted for the offense of assault and battery with intent to have unlawful carnal knowledge. The indictment was found at the September term, 1913, which was within twelve months of the time when the offense was committed. At the January term of court thereafter, and which was more than twelve months from the commission of the offense, a motion was made to quash the indictment on the *114•ground that it did not state the name of the female . upon whom the assault was made. There was a mere blank in the indictment for the insertion of the name. The indictment was confessedly…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Swalley v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Weston v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  3. State v. ChildSupreme Court of Kansas · 1890
  4. Stafford v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1894
  5. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1885

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by23 opinions

  1. State v. PearsonTennessee Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. LawsonTennessee Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Smith v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Davenport v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1921
  5. State v. SeagravesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1992

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API