Legal Opinion
Thompson's Administrator v. First National Bank
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
Decided May 9, 1930PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
Judge Dietzman
Affirming.
This is the second appeal of this case. The opinion on the former appeal is reported in 225 Ky. 399, 9 S. W. (2d) 123, 129, where an elaborate statement of the facts may be found. In the course of that opinion, after stating that both the appellant and appellee had concurred in the employment of Hal Corbett, we said:
“If it was intended by such employment for Corbett to act as the agent of each to thé extent of his respective interest and the bank retained its right to control and direct his actions, or continued to assert such control, he became…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Clark v. CooperCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1922
- Mathis v. Bank of TaylorsvilleCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
- Dyer v. StaggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
- Thompson v. First Nat. Bank of HarrodsburgCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
3Cited by4 opinions
- Engleman v. Caldwell and JonesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
- Bringardner Lumber Co. v. KnucklesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1939
- Chicago, B. & Q. R. Co. v. BlakemoreCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1933
- Norfolk & W. Ry. Co. v. BlevinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1949