Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Salisbury (In re Goldman)
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 17, 1995No. 94-55489PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The memorandum disposition filed October 5, 1995, is redesignated as a per curiam opinion.
OPINION
2Per curiam
George Goldman, a debtor in Chapter 7 bankruptcy, appeals the district court’s order overruling the bankruptcy court and denying him an extra homestead exemption under California Code of Civil Procedure § 704.730(a)(3). We reverse and remand.
Section 704.730(a)(3)(C) provides a special $100,000 homestead exemption to “[a] person 55 years of age or older with a gross annual income of not more than fifteen thousand dollars ($15,000) ...” Goldman was over 55 years old when he filed for…
3Cases cited3 opinions
- California Teachers Ass'n v. San Diego Community College DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1981
- Rich v. State Board of OptometryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
- In Re Eric Anderson and Anna Anderson, Debtors. Redwood Empire Production Credit Association v. Eric Anderson and Anna AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
4Cited by11 opinions
- In Re Muriel Nash Reaves, Fka Muriel Adams Reaves, Debtor. William Little v. Muriel Nash ReavesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Shamban v. PerryBankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2006
- Yaden v. Robinson (In Re Robinson)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Little v. Reaves (In Re Reaves)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,705, 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 8774, 95 Daily Journal D.A.R. 15,241 in Re George Goldman, A/K/A Ellis George Goldman, Debtor. George Goldman, A/K/A Ellis George Goldman, Debtor v. Duke Salisbury, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.