Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fitzpatrick v. McAlister

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 28, 1926No. 17513Published

1Dissent

BRANSON, V. O. J.

(dissenting). In this court the parties bear the same adversary positions as they bore in the district court. They are, therefore, referred to as plaint-itT and defendants.

One Kirby Fitzpatrick, as plaintiff, sued the State Board of Public Affairs, the State Election Board, and the individual members of each. He prayed relief, enjoining the defendants from causing to -be printed on the official Democratic primary ballots to be used throughout the state in the primary to be held, as required by law, the first Tuesday in August, 1926, the name of M. E. Trapp. The said M. E.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Ex Parte CrumpCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. People ex rel. Lynch v. BuddCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  3. State Ex Rel. Trapp v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1923
  4. Clifford v. HellerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1899
  5. People v. WellsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1852

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API