Legal Opinion
Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. Hubbard
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Virginia
Decided October 3, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDOWELL, District Judge.
On a petition praying that R. M. Hubbard be enjoined from proceeding with an action at law against the Fidelity & Casualty Company in the corporation court of Dan-ville, Va. It appears that on May 9, 1902, R. M. Hubbard, a citizen of Virginia, sued out from the office of the clerk of the corporation court of Danville a summons requiring the company, a citizen of New York, to appear at first June rules, 1902, and answer a declaration in trespass on the case, the damages being laid at $4,000. The summons was served in due time. At first June rules the declaration was…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Powers v. Chesapeake & Ohio Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Goldey v. Morning NewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Martin's Administrator v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wilson v. Winchester & P. R. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of West Virginia · 1897
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Clintwood Bank, Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1930
- Arrigo v. Commonwealth Casualty Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1930
- Connor v. Real Title Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1947
- Hager v. New York Oil Co.District Court, W.D. Washington · 1927
- Elms v. CraneSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1919