Larson v. Gilliam
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Whether the appellant committed family offenses was a disputed factual issue. The determination of the Family Court regarding the credibility of witnesses, as the trier of fact, is entitled to great weight (see Matter of Rankoth v Sloan, 44 AD3d 863 [2007]; Matter of Dancer v Robertson, 38 AD3d 887 [2007]). The fair preponderance of the evidence supports the Family Court’s determination, in effect, that the appellant committed the family offenses of disorderly conduct and aggravated harassment in the second degree, and two separate offenses of harassment in the second degree, warranting the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Wallace v. WallaceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Rankoth v. SloanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Vahkeuren v. CraftAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bonsignore v. BonsignoreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Dancer v. RobertsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3Cited by9 opinions
- Gray v. GrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Hasbrouck v. HasbrouckAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Fleming v. FlemingAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Del Canto v. BehrensAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Delano v. DesimoneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.