Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Schulz

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided August 29, 1934PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Wingate, S.

Although he does not appear to realize the fact, the present accountant is impaled upon the horns of a dilemma. He admits the receipt of assets aggregating $6,790.32, against which he claims credits for alleged disbursements amounting to $6,597.45, leaving an apparent balance of $172.87 in his hands. Of these expenditures, however, $4,441.50 was for payments of mortgage principal and interest on premises 476 Seventy-sixth street, Brooklyn, which passed to him as sole heir at law upon the intestacy of the decedent.

In his memorandum the accountant emphasizes the point that it is no…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of GillNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  2. In re RecknagelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. In re the Estate of HornerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1933
  4. In re the Estate of O'NeillNew York Surrogate's Court · 1932
  5. In re the Estate of GellisNew York Surrogate's Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of SegallNew York Court of Appeals · 1941
  2. In re the Estate of FrommeltNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API