Legal Opinion

Faist v. Faist

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided June 22, 1934PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.

In March, 1933, the plaintiff applied to the circuit court of the state of Oregon for Marion county for an order upon her husband to provide support for herself and her minor child. In her petition she alleged that she and the defendant were married in February, 1903, and the issue of said marriage was four children, all of whom are of age except the youngest, aged 14 years; and that plaintiff was and for more than a year last past had been a resident of Marion county, Oregon. Paragraph IV of the complaint is as follows:

“That plaintiff and defendant are not living together as husband and wife…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rutenic v. HamakarOregon Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Gentry v. Pacific Livestock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Matlock v. MatlockOregon Supreme Court · 1917
  4. United States Nat. Bank v. ShehanOregon Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Crocker v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1929

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Kelley v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
  2. In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GreisamerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
  3. Emerick v. EmerickOregon Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Rodda v. RoddaOregon Supreme Court · 1948

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API