Faist v. Faist
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBailey, J.
In March, 1933, the plaintiff applied to the circuit court of the state of Oregon for Marion county for an order upon her husband to provide support for herself and her minor child. In her petition she alleged that she and the defendant were married in February, 1903, and the issue of said marriage was four children, all of whom are of age except the youngest, aged 14 years; and that plaintiff was and for more than a year last past had been a resident of Marion county, Oregon. Paragraph IV of the complaint is as follows:
“That plaintiff and defendant are not living together as husband and wife…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Rutenic v. HamakarOregon Supreme Court · 1902
- Gentry v. Pacific Livestock Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1904
- Matlock v. MatlockOregon Supreme Court · 1917
- United States Nat. Bank v. ShehanOregon Supreme Court · 1920
- Crocker v. RussellOregon Supreme Court · 1929
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kelley v. KelleyOregon Supreme Court · 1948
- In re the Dissolution of the Marriage of GreisamerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Emerick v. EmerickOregon Supreme Court · 1943
- Rodda v. RoddaOregon Supreme Court · 1948