Neofes v. Robertshaw Controls Co.
District Court, S.D. Indiana
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
STECKLER, Chief Judge.
This matter came before the Court on the motion of defendant Robertshaw Controls Company (Robertshaw) to dismiss Counts II and III of the plaintiffs’ complaint and on the motion of defendant Cal Gas Charlestown, Inc. (Cal Gas) to dismiss Count II of the complaint for the reason that said counts “fail to state facts sufficient to constitute causes of action.”
The plaintiffs, John and Bernice Neofes, are husband and wife. At the time of the accident described in the complaint the plaintiffs were lessees of Mrs. Viola Hardy. The complaint alleges…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- West v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Suvada v. White Motor Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1965
- Ayr-Way Stores, Inc. v. Chitwood Ex Rel. ChitwoodIndiana Supreme Court · 1973
- Barth v. B. F. Goodrich Tire Co.California Court of Appeal · 1968
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Kenneth Gumbs and Yvonne Gumbs v. International Harvester, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Leeb v. Guy (In Re Guy)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Indiana · 1988
- Adams v. Buffalo Forge Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1982
- Thiele v. Faygo Beverage, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Joe A. Corbin and Marta C. Corbin v. Coleco Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.