Legal Opinion

Dix Bros. v. State

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided October 26, 1981PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EDWARD S. MILLER, J. S. C.

The issue presented is whether defendant is liable to plaintiff for crop damage caused by wild deer. For the reasons set forth herein it is declared it is not. The facts are these:

*270In the spring of 1978 plaintiff’s crop of iceberg lettuce was destroyed by wild deer. The State of New Jersey and Department of Environmental Protection, Division of Fish, Game & Shellfisheries managed the property adjacent to plaintiff’s fields. Plaintiff alleges that defendant improperly maintained and controlled wild deer then living on defendant property, such that the deer trespassed…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Costa v. JoseySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1980
  2. Fitzgerald v. PalmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  3. Hoy v. CapelliSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1966
  4. Sickman v. United States (Two Cases). Ryal v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
  5. Woodsum v. Pemberton Tp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Paternoster v. NJ Transp. Dept.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1983
  2. Strauss v. Township of HolmdelNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API