Legal Opinion

Hedrick v. Kramer

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1873PublishedCited by 8 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, J.

This was an ¿Tction by the appellant against the appellee, on contract. The plaintiff below recovered a judgment against the defendant for thirty dollars; and on motion of the defendant, the latter recovered a judgment against the plaintiff for his costs in the cause. The plaintiff excepted as to the judgment for costs. On appeal to general term, the judgment rendered at special term was affirmed.

The correctness of the judgment for costs is questioned in this court.

“ In actions for money demands on contract, commenced in the circuit court or court of common pleas, if the plaintiff recover…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Durousseau v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1810

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Barber Asphalt Paving Co. v. EdgertonIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  3. Hedderich v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Middleton v. GreesonIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Bell v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API