(HC) Wirth v. Superior Court County of Sacramento

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES A. WIRTH, No. 2:20-cv-2213 AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 SUPERIOR COURT, COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a motion under Federal Rule of 18 Civil Procedure 60(b), a motion for appointment of counsel, and a request to proceed in forma 19 pauperis. ECF Nos. 1, 3, 6. 20 Examination of the in forma pauperis application reveals that petitioner is unable to afford 21 the costs of suit. Accordingly,…