Legal Opinion

Haggard Drilling, Inc. v. Greene

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1975No. 40117PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Colwell, District Judge.

•This is a suit to recover $13,219.60 as the unpaid balance due for drilling five irrigation wells. Plaintiff claims three theories of recovery, express contract, implied contract, and quasi-contract based upon unjust enrichment. Defendant Ralph W. Greene was not served with process; he did not appear. The default of defend ant Edward L. Lewis was entered. Issues were joined as to defendants Maddux, and trial thereon was had to the court. Judgment was entered for defendants Maddux. We affirm.

On April 17, 1970, defendants Thomas A. Maddux and Helen Maddux, husband and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bush v. KramerNebraska Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Wonderling v. ConleyNebraska Supreme Court · 1967

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Carol Marmo v. Tyson Fresh MeatsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. Wyeth, Inc. v. Blue Cross & Blue Shield of AlabamaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  3. Indianapolis Raceway Park, Inc. v. CurtissIndiana Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. Hoffman v. Reinke Manufacturing Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  5. Thimjon Farms Partnership v. First International Bank & TrustNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API