Legal Opinion

Ex Parte AB

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 21, 2006No. 1050514Published

1Opinion of the Court

950 So.2d 1142 (2006)

Ex parte A.B.

(In re C.D., as executrix of the estate of E.F.

v.

A.B. et al.).

1050514.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

July 21, 2006.

Edward Still, Birmingham, for petitioner.

Julia T. Cochrun of Pate & Cochrun, LLP, Birmingham, for respondent.

HARWOOD, Justice.[1]

This mandamus proceeding involves the proper balancing between the privacy interest of the defendant in the underlying civil action, which has become implicated as hereinafter explained, and the interest of the plaintiff in conducting an informed voir dire of the jury venire. In order to honor, at this level, the privacy…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Eisenstadt v. BairdSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Ex Parte Ocwen Federal Bank, FSBSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003
  4. Phillips v. Smalley Maintenance Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
  5. Ex Parte Miltope CorporationSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API