Legal Opinion

McMillan v. Joseph Decosimo and Co.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided December 31, 1997No. 96-6981Published

1Opinion of the Court

PUBLISH IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT No. 96-6981 D. C. Docket No. CV-94-G-1572-NE Bkcy Court. No. 88-6467 IN RE: DAS A. BORDEN & COMPANY, Debtor. ED LEIGH McMILLAN, II, MONTFORD COMPANIES, INC., Plaintiffs-Appellees, versus JOSEPH DECOSIMO AND COMPANY, Defendant-Appellant, DAS A. BORDEN & COMPANY, Defendant. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (December 31, 1997) Before HATCHETT, Chief Judge, FAY and FARRIS*, Senior Circuit Judges. ___________________________________________________________________ *Honorable…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. In Re Arthur R. Miller and Janet E. Miller, Debtors. Equitable Bank v. Arthur R. Miller, and Janet E. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  2. In the Matter of Triangle Chemicals, Inc., Debtor. Darryl Fanelli v. Nelson T. Hensley, TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
  3. Otte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. In re JarvisCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1995
  5. In Re James W. LAND & Lois L. Land, Debtors. James W. LAND, Lois L. Land & Thomas J. Kerwin, Appellants, v. FIRST NATIONAL BANK OF ALAMOSA, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API