Legal Opinion

Koester v. City of Novi

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 17, 1998No. 105508, Calendar No. 3PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.

In this case we are asked to determine two things: (1) whether plaintiff has stated a claim under the Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act (HORA), MCL 37.1101 et seq.; MSA 3.550(101) et seq., and (2) whether comments and harassing conduct relating to a woman’s pregnancy can give rise to a claim for sexual harassment as defined by the Michigan Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.; MSA 3.548(101) et seq.

We hold that pregnancy, standing alone, is not a handicap under the HCRA because it is not a substantial limitation of a major life activity. We also hold that harassing comments and conduct relating…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. Pasha Hunt-Golliday v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Chambers v. Trettco, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Guerrero v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
  5. Diamond v. WitherspoonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API