Koester v. City of Novi
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtCavanagh, J.
In this case we are asked to determine two things: (1) whether plaintiff has stated a claim under the Handicappers’ Civil Rights Act (HORA), MCL 37.1101 et seq.; MSA 3.550(101) et seq., and (2) whether comments and harassing conduct relating to a woman’s pregnancy can give rise to a claim for sexual harassment as defined by the Michigan Civil Rights Act, MCL 37.2101 et seq.; MSA 3.548(101) et seq.
We hold that pregnancy, standing alone, is not a handicap under the HCRA because it is not a substantial limitation of a major life activity. We also hold that harassing comments and conduct relating…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harris v. Forklift Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Oncale v. Sundowner Offshore Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1998
- General Electric Co. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Pasha Hunt-Golliday v. Metropolitan Water Reclamation District of Greater ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- McCORMICK v. CARRIERMichigan Supreme Court · 2010
- Donajkowski v. Alpena Power Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Chambers v. Trettco, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2000
- Guerrero v. SmithMichigan Court of Appeals · 2008
- Diamond v. WitherspoonMichigan Court of Appeals · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.