Schlette v. Washington
Louisiana Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
I,ARMSTRONG, Judge.
This is an automobile personal injury case. The plaintiff appeals and argues that (1) the jury erred by failing to allocate the fault equally between the two defendant drivers; (2) that the jury erred by faffing to award general damages despite the award of special damages; and (3) the jury erred by awarding inadequate special damages for lost wages/ lost earning capacity. We hold that it was error as a matter of law to fail to award any general damages when special damages for medical expenses were awarded and we will modify the judgment accordingly. Other*199wise, we will…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Rosell v. EscoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989
- Stobart v. State Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Clement v. FreySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1996
- Olivier v. Sears Roebuck & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Odendahl v. WildLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Wainwright v. FontenotSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2000
- Wainwright v. FontenotLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1999