Legal Opinion

State v. Stanley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 6, 1976No. 7614SC301Published

1Opinion of the Court

ARNOLD, Judge.

Appellant argues that the solicitor’s two year delay in filing the petition violated G.S. 20-223. That statute provides that

“[t]he District Attorney, upon receiving the aforesaid abstract from the Commissioner, shall forthwith file a petition against the person named therein in the superior court division of the county wherein such person resides . . . [emphasis added].”

Appellant argues that forthwith, as used in the statute, means “immediately.” However, the word forthwith can also mean “within a reasonable time under the circumstances” or “as soon as reasonably can be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Simpson v. GarrettCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API