Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Porter

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 25, 1968No. 5-4754PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Conley Byrd, Justice.

The probate judge found that the real estate description in paragraph 3 of the first codicil to Mrs. Mattie Pipkin Smith’s will was defective and refused to amend the description to conform to the description that the testatrix allegedly gave to her lawyer. Appellant Mary Juanita Meyers Hardy, the sole beneficiary of paragraph 3 of the codicil, appeals alleging that the probate court erred in declaring void paragraph 3 of the codicil.

Paragraph 9 (b) of the will, executed on August 22, 1953, provides:

“Upon the death of the last surviving of my said sisters and brother, my…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Eagle v. OldhamSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1915
  2. McDonald v. ShawSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1909
  3. Jackson v. WolfeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1917

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Armstrong v. ButlerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Angel v. AngelSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
  3. Hare v. First Security BankSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API