Legal Opinion
State v. Crusius
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided November 15, 1894PublishedCited by 7 opinions
On indictment.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Dixon, J.
At the December Term, 1893, of the Hudson County Oyer and Terminer, the defendants were indicted in the usual form for keeping a disorderly house, and in May, 1894, they pleaded guilty. The judges of the Oyer and Terminer being unable to agree upon a sentence, the state caused the proceedings to be removed into this court, and now prays judgment on the plea.
The defendants move in arrest of judgment, basing their motion upon a written stipulation, signed by their counsel and the public prosecutor, and sent up by the court below as part of its…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- United States v. TynenSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Yeaton and Others, of the Schooner General Pinkney and Cargo v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1809
- Norris v. CrockerSupreme Court of the United States · 1852
- Hartung v. . the PeopleNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. Blisak, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Somerset County1948
- Hutton v. Autoridad Sobre Hogares De La CapitalDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1948
- Martin v. MorrisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1932
- State v. WootenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- State v. FarielloNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.