Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Mentaberry v. Mentaberry

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1923No. 2587Published

1Concurrence

Coleman; J.,

concurring:

I concur in the order of affirmance. ■ The theory of appellant is that, being a partner, the privilege of closing up the affairs of the partnership vested in him. Unquestionably this general rule is well recognized and has been incorporated into our statutory law (Rev. Laws, 6025; Yturriaga v. Cobeaga, 47 Nev. 59, 214 Pac. 27), but the question naturally arises in this connection if that right is not a mere privilege, which may be renounced or waived.

Let us look at the facts of this case: At the time of the death of Juan Mentaberry, the plaintiff was, and for eight…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Yturriaga v. CobeagaNevada Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API