Legal Opinion
Unigard Mutual Insurance v. McCarty's, Inc.
District Court, D. Idaho
Decided July 22, 1988No. Civ. 83-CV-1441PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
CALLISTER, District Judge.
The Court has before it motions for summary judgment filed by all plaintiffs. Consideration of these motions was delayed for a considerable time as defendants attempted to secure legal counsel. The defendants filed a response brief on June 23, 1988, and the Court allowed two other parties (Pacific Hide & Fur, Inc., and Idaho Power Company) to file an amicus brief. The matter has now been fully briefed and is at issue. The Court must determine whether there exist any genuine issues of material fact. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(c).
In this action, four…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Robert Blake v. Sant Pallan v. Willie R. Barnes, Commissioner of Corporations of the State of California, Plaintiff-In-Intervention/appellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. Conservation Chemical Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1986
- Bankers Trust Co. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1981
- Harman v. Northwestern Mutual Life Insurance Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1967
- Bankers Trust Company v. Hartford Accident and Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Allstate Insurance Co. v. Dana Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Hatco Corp. v. W.R. Grace & Co.—Conn.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- PEDERSON'S FRYER FARMS v. TransamericaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Figgie International, Inc. v. Fred W. Bailey, James Upfield, Travelers Ins. Co., and Insurance Co. Of North AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
- Olds-Olympic, Inc. v. Commercial Union Ins.Washington Supreme Court · 1996
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.