Legal Opinion
Dunn v. Wagner
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 16, 1937No. Civ. 10330PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtTyler, P. J.
Action for damages for personal injuries. Plaintiffs are husband and wife and they alleged that the wife suffered the injuries complained of on account of the negligence of defendants in the construction and maintenance of a sidewalk fronting their property at the dividing line thereof from the sidewalk immediately to the north. The complaint alleges that plaintiff Lee Mae Dunn stepped on a high and sharp edge caused by a drop in the sidewalk, causing her to fall and become injured. The action was based upon two theories: First, that the said sidewalk as maintained by defendants constituted a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Whiting v. City of National CityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- Mora v. FavillaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Davis v. California Street Cable RailroadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Weihe v. Rathjen Mercantile Co.California Court of Appeal · 1917
- Kennedy v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1908
3Cited by13 opinions
- Barrett v. City of ClaremontCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Fielder v. City of GlendaleCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Lay v. Pacific Perforating Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Graves v. RomanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- Beck v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.