Legal Opinion

Harris v. Maxwell

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 23, 1965No. 39215PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In this action, petitioner contends that he has been denied due process and equal protection of the laws by the refusal of the trial court to grant his request for a trial transcript so that he could perfect his appeal. However, *338no appeal was prosecuted from this alleged denial of a bill of exceptions.

The question, as to whether an accused has been- denied a transcript of testimony and by such denial deprived of his constitutional rights, is a question which must be raised by appeal from the order denying such transcript and is not cognizable in habeas corpus. Tinsley v. Maxwell, Warden, 176…

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ArmstrongOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API