Legal Opinion

Rygg v. Kalispell Board of Adjustment

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 28, 1976No. 13033PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Castles

This is an appeal by plaintiffs from a judgment of the district court, Flathead County, affirming a variance order granted by the Kalispell Board of Adjustment for the operation of a law office in a zoned residential area.

Plaintiffs, appellants here, are residents of Block 105, Kalispell, Montana. Block 105 is zoned as a No. 1 Residential District. The intervenors are William E. and David L. Astle, brothers, who are lawyers. They purchased a residence in the zoned residential area and requested a variance for the operation of a professional office for the practice of law in the residential…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Freeman v. Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  2. Lambros v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT OF CITY OF MISSOULAMontana Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Wheeler v. ArmstrongMontana Supreme Court · 1975
  4. State Ex Rel. Russell Center v. City of MissoulaMontana Supreme Court · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Downtown Neighborhoods Ass'n v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1989
  2. Cutone v. Anaconda Deer LodgeMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Schendel v. Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Carlson v. Yellowstone County Board of AdjustmentMontana Supreme Court · 2017
  5. Cutone v. Anaconda Deer LodgeMontana Supreme Court · 1980

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API