Legal Opinion

Lee Wilson & Co. v. Commissioner

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided November 17, 1941No. 529, OriginalPublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SANBORN, ' Circuit Judge.

After this Court had decided, in Lee Wilson & Co. v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 111 F.2d 313, that a claim of petitioner for refund of an amount paid by it as processing taxes under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, c. 25, 48 Stat. 31, 7 U. S.C.A. § 601 et seq., was insufficient, the petitioner filed another claim for refund of the amount. The respondent disallowed the second claim on the ground that it was a duplicate of the first. On petition to review, the United States Processing Tax Board of Review, on motion of the respondent, entered an order dismissing the petition…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  2. Lee Wilson & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
  3. Tennessee Consolidated Coal Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
  4. Landrum v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Bethlehem Baking Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  2. Angelus Milling Co. v. NunanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
  3. Jaubert Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
  4. Cherokee Textile Mills v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
  5. F. W. Fitch Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1943

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API