Lee Wilson & Co. v. Commissioner
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SANBORN, ' Circuit Judge.
After this Court had decided, in Lee Wilson & Co. v. Commissioner, 8 Cir., 111 F.2d 313, that a claim of petitioner for refund of an amount paid by it as processing taxes under the Agricultural Adjustment Act, c. 25, 48 Stat. 31, 7 U. S.C.A. § 601 et seq., was insufficient, the petitioner filed another claim for refund of the amount. The respondent disallowed the second claim on the ground that it was a duplicate of the first. On petition to review, the United States Processing Tax Board of Review, on motion of the respondent, entered an order dismissing the petition…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Leimer v. State Mut. Life Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Lee Wilson & Co. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1940
- Tennessee Consolidated Coal Co. v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1941
- Landrum v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
3Cited by10 opinions
- Bethlehem Baking Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
- Angelus Milling Co. v. NunanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1944
- Jaubert Bros. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- Cherokee Textile Mills v. CommissionerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1947
- F. W. Fitch Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1943
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.