Legal Opinion

Winslow v. Troy Iron & Nail Factory

Ohio Superior Court, Cincinnati

Decided June 15, 1853Published

Special Term. — On motion for a restraining order pendente lite. The facts sufficiently appear in the decision.

1Opinion of the CourtSpencer, J.

A motion has been made, in this ease, for an injunction, to protect property pendente lite, on a petition filed by the plaintiff to enjoin the defendants from proceeding to subject certain mortgaged property to the payment of a claim held by the defendants, the Troy Iron and Nail Factory, against the Covington and Lexington Railroad Company. It appears from the petition, and affidavits in its support, that the Covington and Lexington Railroad Company, organized under a law of Kentucky, are empowered to construct and maintain a railway, with its appendages, from Covington to Lexington, in said…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. The Bank of the United States v. Elizabeth LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1839
  2. Skiff v. SolaceSupreme Court of Vermont · 1851
  3. De Lane v. MooreSupreme Court of the United States · 1853
  4. Livingston v. HeermanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1821

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API