Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Cockrell v. State

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided May 7, 2004No. 1021997Published

1Concurrence

I concur in the scholarly main opinion. I write specially only to add some supporting observations.

The undisputed facts are that the defendant, intending and trying to shoot his adversary Carlos Ivey to death, missed Ivey and wounded a bystander, Jerome Fails. Because the attempted-murder indictment against the defendant untruly alleged that the defendant intended to kill the bystander Fails and the State proved only that the defendant intended to kill his adversary Ivey, the State failed in its proof of the intent element alleged in the indictment. Therefore, the Court of Criminal Appeals…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Summers v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1977
  3. Simpson v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1877
  4. Free v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1984
  5. Gettings v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1947

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API