Legal Opinion

Raiford v. State

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 15, 1882PublishedCited by 15 opinions

Verdict. Witness. Criminal Law. Before Judge CARSWELL. Jefferson Superior Court. November Adjourned Term, 1881. Reported in the decision.

1Opinion of the Court

Crawford, Justice.

The plaintiff in error was indicted for incestuous fornication with one Kate C. Griffin, his niece, was found guilty, moved fora new trial, which was refused, and that refusal is complained of as error.

There were several grounds in the motion for a new trial, but a decision upon two of them will rule the case, and they are:

(1.) That Kate C. Griffin being an accomplice, and the only witness for the state who testified to the criminal act, is uncorroborated by other evidence.

(2.) That the evidence makes out a case of rape, and not incestuous fornication.

1. Was there, then,…

2Cited by15 opinions

  1. Porath v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Perryman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1940
  3. McCaskill v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  4. State v. WinslowUtah Supreme Court · 1906
  5. Solomon v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API