Legal Opinion · Dissent

Di Sanza v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 29, 2008Published

1Dissent

Lippman, EJ., and Mazzarelli, J., dissent

in a memorandum by Mazzarelli, J., as follows: I would reverse the order appealed and reinstate the complaint. Plaintiff was injured on March 19, 2003 when he allegedly tripped and fell over a raised metal sidewalk grating. The grating covered a vault containing a transformer owned and maintained by Con Edison. Con Edison had a duty to maintain the subject grating in a reasonably safe condition based on its special use of the sidewalk and as the owner of the grating (see Posner v New York City Tr. Auth., 27 AD3d 542 [2006]; Ausderan v City of New York,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Posner v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. Giambrone v. New York YankeesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  3. Jacobsen v. KrumholzAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  4. Ausderan v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. Denyssenko v. Plaza Realty Services, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API