Legal Opinion

Williamson v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 30, 1998PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Jane Solomon, J.), entered February 27, 1997, which granted plaintiff’s motion to strike defendant’s answer for disclosure noncompliance, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

Defendant’s alleged good faith efforts are belied by its repeated failure to produce the witness for any of the three court-ordered deposition dates spanning a period of two years (see, Periphery Loungewear v Kantron Roofing Corp., 214 AD2d 438), and its excuses are insufficient to establish a reasonable basis for its noncompliance (see, Furniture Fantasy v Cerrone, 154 AD2d 506).…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Furniture Fantasy, Inc. v. CerroneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. Periphery Loungewear, Inc. v. Kantron Roofing Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Reidel v. Ryder TRS, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. John v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  3. Nussbaum v. D'AmicoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API