Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Clay

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1914No. Appeals, Nos. 78, 79 and 80PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeals, Nos. 78, 79 and 80, by defendants, from judgment of Q. S. Phila. Co., Jan. Sessions, 1912, No. 735, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Henry Clay, John R. Wiggins and Willard H. Walls. Indictment for conspiracy. Before Staples, P. J., specially presiding. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty, upon which judgment of sentence was passed.

Read the full summary

Appeals, Nos. 78, 79 and 80, by defendants, from judgment of Q. S. Phila. Co., Jan. Sessions, 1912, No. 735, on verdict of guilty in case of Commonwealth v. Henry Clay, John R. Wiggins and Willard H. Walls. Indictment for conspiracy. Before Staples, P. J., specially presiding. At the trial the jury returned a verdict of guilty, upon which judgment of sentence was passed. Upon a rule for a new trial Staples, P. J., filed the following opinion: The substance of the offense charged in the indictment upon which the defendants above named were tried, was, that they falsely and maliciously…

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Portee, J.,

The indictment charged Henry Clay, John R. Wiggins, Willard H. Walls and Carl Zilenziger with conspiracy to cheat and defraud the city of Philadelphia, and with having, in pursuance of such conspiracy, been *451guilty of overt acts, in the letting and carrying out of contracts for the erection and alteration of certain buildings, by which the said city was defrauded of a large amount of money. Henry Clay was, at the time of the letting of said contracts, of the performance of the work thereunder and of the payment for the same, the director of public safety of the city of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Holt v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  2. Commonwealth v. RazmusSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1905
  3. Commonwealth v. BartilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
  4. Commonwealth v. BeardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  5. Commonwealth v. SandersonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1909

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. JermynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  2. Schirra v. Delaware, L. & WR Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1952
  3. State v. LiljaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1923
  4. Commonwealth v. Delancy, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Cumberland County1968
  5. Commonwealth v. KeppelSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API