Arnold v. R. Rothschild's Sons Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Morris Arnold and another, comprising the firm of M. Arnold & Co., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 23d day of March, 1896, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 17th day of March, 1896, denying the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.
Read the full summary
Appeal by the plaintiffs, Morris Arnold and another, comprising the firm of M. Arnold & Co., from a judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the defendant, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of New York on the 23d day of March, 1896, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 17th day of March, 1896, denying the plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial made upon the minutes. This appeal was transferred from the first department to the second department.
1Opinion of the Court
Willard Bartlett, J.:
This is an action to recover two months’ rent, upon an allege^ lease for one year, of certain premises on Broadway in the city of New York. The defendant corporation interposed a general denial *607to the complaint. The agent through whom the lease was said to have been made was a real estate broker named Leon Tannenbaum, and the evidence in behalf of the plaintiffs to prove the contract consisted chiefly of his testimony and certain correspondence between him and Messrs. A. M. & David Rothschild, who represented the defendant corporation in New York.
As to the correspondence…
2Cited by2 opinions
- Arnold v. R. Rothschild's Sons Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
- Arnold v. R. Rothschilds Sons Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897