Legal Opinion

Feick v. Hill Bread Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 17, 1918PublishedCited by 3 opinions

On appeal from a decree advised by Yice-Chancellor Foster.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Swayze, J.

Such difficulty, if any, as there may be in this case, disappears when the facts are clearly apprehended. The situation is this: Feiek’s estate has been decreed to be insolvent. Among the claims filed with the executrix, which, by the adjudication of the orphans court, are to be held and deemed as justly due *190(Comp. Stat. p. 3850 pl. 104), are a claim by the Union National Bank and a claim by the Hill Bread Company. The claim of the bank includes a claim for the amount due on notes of the Hill Bread Company endorsed by Feick, amounting to…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re KuserNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1942
  2. Thomas v. National BankUnited States District Court · 1938
  3. Withers v. Jefferson Trust Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API