Legal Opinion
Forman v. Penn
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided March 14, 2011No. 33A01-1007-CT-343PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION ON REHEARING
BAKER, Judge.
Appellants-third-party-defendants Wayne Penn, Lisa Orr, and Bradley Orr (collectively, the Appellants) argue on rehearing that the trial court erroneously granted summary judgment in favor of appellee-third-party-plaintiff Western Reserve Mutual Casualty Company (Western Reserve). Specifically, the Appellants con tend that the trial court erred by concluding as a matter of law that Western Reserve does not have a duty to defend them from the lawsuit filed against them by Phillip Forman. Finding no error, we affirm.
FACTS
The facts, as described in our original…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Owens Corning Fiberglass Corp. v. CobbIndiana Supreme Court · 2001
- Morris v. Economy Fire & Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2006
- Linder v. TICOR TITLE INS. OF CALIFORNIAIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Massachusetts Property Insurance Underwriting Ass'n v. GallagherMassachusetts Appeals Court · 2009
- Forman v. PennIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
3Cited by11 opinions
- Keckler v. Meridian Security Insurance Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Shuler v. Estate of Botkins ex rel. BotkinsIndiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- In Re the Adoption of S.J., R.W. v. G.C. and J.C.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Skolnik v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2015
- Skolnik v. Allied Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2016
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.