Legal Opinion

Pace v. Pace

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 31, 1956No. 392PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

At the threshold- of this appeal it is noted that the pleadings are not contained in the record filed in this Court. Pleadings are a necessary part of the record proper upon appeal — Rule 19, Section 1, of the Rules of Practice in the Supreme Court, 221 N.C. 544, at page 553. And Rule 20 of Rules of Practice provides that “Memoranda of pleadings will not be received or recognized in the Supreme Court as pleadings, even by consent.” Failure to send up necessary parts of the record proper has uniformly resulted in dismissal of the appeal. See among others S. v. Lumber Co., 207 N.C. 47, 175 S.E.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ritchie v. . WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  2. Ritchie v. WhiteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  3. State v. Ravensford Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  4. Griffin v. BarnesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Medley v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992
  2. Goodyear v. GoodyearSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  3. Mooneyham v. MooneyhamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Chapman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1986
  5. Medley v. North Carolina Department of CorrectionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API