Legal Opinion

Ex parte Gaume

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided May 7, 1901PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Habeas Corpus.

1Opinion of the CourtSherwood, P. J.

Petitioner was fined by T. B. Mc-Anley, police judge of Kansas City, the sum of $2 for driving á one-horse grocery wagón along the streets of that municipality without license, in violation of ordinance 15350. Whereupon, petitioner comes up to this court and presents his petition for habeas corpus, asserting that his imprisonment is illegal, on the ground that said ordinance is void, etc., and asking, in consequence thereof, that he be discharged.

Section 3613 of the Habeas Corpus Act, Un. Rev. Stats. Mo., 1899, provides that “When a person applies for the benefit of this chapter, who is held…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re HaganSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
  2. State Ex Rel. Gentry v. WesthuesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1926
  3. State v. BucknerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1921
  4. Ex parte ShoffnerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API