Nichols v. State

AFTER REMAND FROM ALABAMA SUPREME COURT

This cause was remanded to this court pursuant to the decision of the Alabama Supreme Court in Nichols v. State,624 So.2d 1325 (Ala. 1992), wherein that court held that the appellant was not denied a fair trial because he was unable to discuss the case, before trial, with one of the State's witnesses. Therefore, the remaining issues raised by the appellant will be discussed.

I

The appellant argues that the trial court erroneously denied his motion for individual voir dire examination of the jury venire. However, the manner of conducting voir dire…