Legal Opinion

Arrow v. Faye

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 2, 1982No. 81-2560PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

It indisputably appears that this action for legal malpractice (arising from the ap-pellee’s alleged failure to prosecute appellants’ action for personal injuries within the appropriate statute of limitations) was filed well within two years of the dismissal of the limitations-barred personal injury action and this court’s affirmance of that dismissal. Therefore, to the extent that appellants’ amended complaint was dismissed below as being without the two-year limitations period fixed for such an action,' see § 95.11(4)(a), Fla.Stat. (1979), such dismissal was error. There being no other…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Washington v. BurdinesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  2. Hampton v. PayneDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API